Subject	I bought my '91tt in '93 and it had 8,300 miles on it.
Posted by	not4resaleZ on July 25, 2008 at 2:27 PM
	This message has been viewed 165 times.
In Reply To	Timing belt, wear vs years vs miles posted by scott1ct on July 25, 2008 at 10:34 AM
Message	This past spring it turned over 60,000 miles on my way to the mechanic for it's first timing belt change. He said it was fine, but I feel a lot better now. Search will give you a post about some statistical analysis that was done in New Zealand.
Follow Ups	Timing belt, wear vs years vs miles - scott1ct 10:34:09 07/25/08 Its better to be safe than sorry... - Kaz (Dallas) 10:42:11 07/25/08 I've seen two old timing belts like yours that looked brand - robo (sebring1970) 10:49:13 07/25/08 What did your former mechanic tell you to do? ;-) - Dave N 10:50:24 07/25/08 Look at it this way. That is a few hundred spent on your - 600ZXR 11:39:02 07/25/08 I bought my '91tt in '93 and it had 8,300 miles on it. - not4resaleZ 14:27:47 07/25/08 Anyone install the Greddy Kevlar timing belt ? - TTkeeper 14:39:59 07/25/08 I thought it sounded great, and perhaps good for longer - not4resaleZ 17:42:23 07/25/08 The manual says to change the belt based on miles, not time - Technomancer 14:57:53 07/25/08 My FSM says 60k or 5 yrs., whichever comes 1st. My TT - ThunderZ 06:54:09 07/26/08 Really? Wow. Could you tell me what page? My manual, page - Technomancer 15:50:14 07/26/08 Even the on-line manual it says it on page MA-4 - ThunderZ 10:07:33 07/27/08
Post a Followup	You cannot reply to this message because you are not logged in.